The question is not whether it is okay to change from a girl to a boy, it’s whether it is possible to change from a girl to a boy. And the answer is a resounding ‘no’.
“Look at this,” a friend sent me via WhatsAp this afternoon. “This nursery is teaching kids about trans stuff, they’ve even tagged in Fox Fisher. Why on earth would a four year old need to know about that?”
I looked at the link she had sent me and saw that, although Sarah Stuart had taken a screenshot, the school had deleted the original tweet (left). This in itself seemed strange. After all, if they thought the lesson was so great they put it on their Twitter feed, why would they delete the tweet?
The book the children are holding is ‘Are You A Boy or a Girl?‘ written by Sarah Savage and Fox Fisher, who are both transgender. It stars the non-binary Tiny, who claims to be neither a boy or a girl. Savage says of the book:
“The main message is about identity and that you can be whoever you want to be. If a child feels they don’t identify with being a boy or a girl there is this wonderful space in the middle that they can be in.”
Strikes me as pretty confusing for a pre-schooler. Of course we can’t be whoever we want to be. While self-encouragement and belief are admirable, certain wishes cannot be fulfilled. A person with one leg cannot choose to grow another one. Someone with a terminal illness cannot choose to cure themselves. We don’t get to choose whether to be a boy or a girl or something in the middle. How about we just teach kids about personality and stereotypes; respect and kindness?
It appears that not only is Broadgreen Primary School in Liverpool a Stonewall Champion, with nursery age kids learning about the joys of being non-binary, but the year 1 pupils – that’s five and six year olds – spent the morning of June 24th studying a book called ‘Jack (not Jackie)’.
‘Jack (not Jackie)’
‘Jack (not Jackie)’, according to its Amazon blurb is ‘a heartwarming picture book’. In it, Jackie’s unnamed sister notes with concern that Jackie is not interested in twirling like a forest fairy, but wants to play with mud instead. Baby Jackie sports a bow in her hair but pulls her ribbons out as soon as she can. She won’t wear dresses, instead she flies around in a superhero cape. She puts on her dad’s clothes and mimics his gestures. Older sister likes her hair ‘swingy’ but Jackie asks mum to cut off all of hers. Jackie’s sister is horrified & shouts at her mum to stop because ‘now Jackie looks like a boy‘. Jackie responds by saying “I am a boy’. Mum is fine with this, Jackie’s sister realises that’s fine too and her ‘heart becomes bubbly again‘.
I kid you not. But don’t trust me, you can read the whole thing for yourself here on Amazon. where it receives this somewhat disconcerting 5 star review from a ‘non-binary’ mother who has not one, not two, but THREE transgender children of her own.
This ‘sweet story of change and acceptance’ advocates for anything but acceptance. The message is very clear – a girl who doesn’t want ‘swingy’ hair and likes superhero capes and mud is quite probably a boy.
Why would teachers be putting it into the heads of children that liking certain things means they are a boy or a girl? Well, if your school is a Stonewall Champion, it’s par for the course.
This is being fed to five year olds under the guise of inclusivity. It is not inclusive and it is very much not okay.
It is sexist as hell, and there is nothing progressive about stereotyping children.
We can see that the work cards the children at Broadgreen Primary use ask another question.
“Are some toys and clothes only for boys only?”
We can safely presume that the correct answer to that would be ‘no, of course not, you can play with what you want‘ but this is direct contrast to the message of the book.
The message of the book is quite clear: Jackie does not like certain toys, clothes and hair styles, therefore she is a boy.
The teachers of Broadgreen Primary are not alone in their ability to believe that clothes and toys should on the one hand not be gendered, but on the other hand a child’s preferences are reason enough for transition.
The organisation Let Toys Be Toys who ‘petition retailers, booksellers and manufacturers to sort and label toys and books by theme or function, rather than by gender‘ caused a kerfuffle earlier this year when they tweeted about ‘Jamie’, another book where a child’s hair and clothes preferences are portrayed as reason enough for transition.
The tweet caused founder member Maya Forstater to comment:
“As one of the co-founders of Let Toys Be Toys I am utterly disappointed that you are now promoting the ideology which says that a girl who wants short hair, likes fixing things and isn’t into sparkles and dresses is ‘in the wrong body’ and must be a boy. Heartbroken.”
If you’re thinking that none of this makes sense, you’re right. It doesn’t. What possible reason is there to tell a boy he is a girl or a girl she is a boy? It is possible to treat a distressed and confused child with kindness, love and compassion without telling them that not only should they have been born the opposite sex, but that it is possible and desirable to try to change themselves to better fit in with the sexism and stereotyping that is so rife in our society.
“Jackie. Jack. The same big round eyes. My sister. My brother. It’s okay either way.” concludes the little girl in the book.
But in what way is it okay?
‘Is it okay to change from a girl to a boy?’ the children are asked, after reading the book.
There are those who would compare books like ‘Jack not Jackie‘ to the 80s ‘Jenny Lives with Eric and Martin‘, a 80s children’s book by Susanne Bösch, which told the story of a child who lived with her two gay dads. The tabloid press of the time was outraged at what it called gay propaganda. It is disingenuous to suggest that these modern child transition books have anything in common with Bösche’s work. Telling a girl that she is a boy is very different to telling a child that two men or two women can fall in love and raise a child. Telling a girl that she’s a boy can cause all sorts of problems for the child- and it isn’t true.
In what way might Jack’s new life as a boy not be ok? Well, ‘Jack (not Jackie)’ doesn’t deal with the mental stress caused by maintaining the levels of cognitive dissonance necessary for a child- and the adults surrounding her- to believe she’s been ‘born in the wrong body’. It doesn’t deal with either the complexities of living by stealth or the issue of being acknowledged as ‘trans’ rather than the ‘preferred gender’ a child was hoping to magically attain. It doesn’t deal with the inevitable arrival of puberty and the blockers needed to attempt to maintain the delusion. It doesn’t deal with the potential side effects of puberty blockers, off-label drugs that were originally developed for men with end-stage prostrate cancer. It doesn’t deal with the issue of compromised fertility. It can’t deal with the potential problems puberty blockers might present for Jack’s cognitive development, because that hasn’t been studied yet, although there are suggestions that the IQ of girls on testosterone may drop by several points. If she persists, and most kids put on blockers do persist, the cross-sex hormones she will be given at age 16 will result in sterility, as her gametes will not have not developed. Loss of sexual function is another possible side effect. Testosterone has a variety of side effects and Jack has a fair chance of developing acne, anger issues, weight gain or male-pattern baldness at a young age. Nor does the book address the potential medical and psychological complications of elective double mastectomy or attempting to construct Jack a penis by skinning her forearm or thigh to create a tube of flesh that can be attached to her groin.
Instead, the children of Broadgreen Primary are asked ‘Is it ok to change from a girl to a boy?‘. Is it ok. What is meant by ‘ok’?
You might as well ask if it’s ok to become a unicorn. Is it ok to go and live in another dimension? Is it ok to grown a second head? These are not proper questions because they are dealing with fantasy situations.
Children this age are susceptible to believing all sorts of things that adults tell them.
But they are being lied to. Because at the end of all this, Jack will still not be a boy.
And we can only hope that she will be ok.
This is an excellent article outlining exactly how sexist and stifling the agenda being forced upon children is. How did such a small, marginalized part of society rise to being in power so quickly, when other, much more massive, marginalized groups (such as women – 51%) still don’t have this kind of power? Oh that’s right – it’s because the trans agenda is run by biological men, who are still calling the shots for everyone else. I’m so glad I don’t have kids now because I would be losing my mind. Also? I was a tomboy. I am happy I got to stay a woman w/out someone convincing me to chop off my breasts and take hormones for life because I climbed trees, played with bugs and dirt, and my brothers’ matchbox cars.
How this Trans rubbish has ever been allowed into schools, is beyond me. This is grooming, propaganda & abusive af. I fear this trans mess will get worse before it gets better, & I despair for kids being fed this tripe. The media constantly tells us about how young people are more & more suffering with mental health difficulties, & can only think that this will get infinitely worse, as a result of very young kids being fed these lies. It’s got to stop!!!
Horrific the pandemic male instigated propaganda concerning ‘mens’ myth of trans’ now being taught to pre-school girls and boys. Once upon a time long long ago pre-school was about preparing girls and boys for the day they would enter elementary schools. Now the primary focus is on indoctrinating these female and male children with mens’ lies!
Eugenics by another name is the primary reason why these lies are being promoted within increasing numbers of schools and preschools. Who benefits from all these lies?
Not the female and male children but certainly mens’ pharmaceutical industries and male dominated medical professions. It also reinforces the centuries old male lie that ‘appropriate sex roles are fixed and not mens’ theories or misogynistic claims wherein females must not show an interest in ‘male subjects’ because these are ‘for the boys not the girls!’ An excellent and proven method of maintaining male hierarchical power over all women because no woman can ever be a scientist/inventor/fly a plane because they are all male professions!
Equally appalling is the enormous psychological and physical damage being inflicted on female and male pre-schoolers because they do not have the capacity to recognise when a supposed teacher is telling them a ‘pack of lies!’
Biology is fixed – no male can magically morph into a female and vice versa but that hasn’t prevented the latest male lie swiftly becoming mens’ definitive truth!
This should be required reading in all schools, but especially those designated as Stonewall Champion!
Hello from Seattle, Thank you for the excellent article. I’ve kept my gender-abolitionist head down on trans issues so far, but I will need to speak up soon. Among other things, I am appalled at the books apparently being read in Seattle public schools. And by books I find in the library that are praised as excellent for children. The messages are scientifically false and very harmful to children. Children are being told that it’s possible for them to be in “the wrong body”. That someone who is a boy today might turn out to be a girl tomorrow, and that each of us will have to decide what sex we are. Stereotypes are being reinforced big-time.
A book called “Sex Is A Funny Word” explains genitalia to children: “Some bodies have a penis and some don’t.” ” Some bodies have a vulva and some don’t.” Children have to search deep into the book to find out that these body parts have something to do with your sex, but even then the wording is messed up: “most boys are born with a penis and scrotum, and most girls are born with a vulva, vagina, and clitoris. But having a penis isn’t what makes you a boy. Having a vulva isn’t what makes you a girl.”
I am struggling to find anyone here in Seattle to talk to about this, who hasn’t drunk the Kool-aid, someone to align with if I decide the risk of deplatforming on ecological issues, is worth taking….increasingly I see that remaining silent is not an option. So far I haven’t been able to identify any groups that have challenged the school trans education policies. Does anyone have any leads here for me to talk to???
Good luck finding people in your area to discuss this with. The gaslighting of schoolchildren through ‘helpful’ books is awful: it does real harm and most people are scared to speak out about it.